In a disturbing and shocking revelation that has captivated the public’s attention, a scandal involving a man, posing as a woman, has exploded across social media and news outlets worldwide. The case, which first emerged from a viral video, has now evolved into a complex and chilling criminal investigation, exposing a web of deceit, manipulation, and non-consensual exploitation. The real identity of the man behind this horrifying scam has been uncovered, sending shockwaves throughout the public and raising serious questions about privacy, digital exploitation, and the vulnerability of online personas.
The story began in July 2025, when a CCTV video surfaced online. The footage depicted an elderly man dressed in women’s clothing, including a red outfit, makeup, and heels, accompanied by a young boy who appeared visibly uncomfortable. Although the video was silent, the body language and the atmosphere of the scene immediately signaled something deeply troubling. The unsettling video quickly went viral, spreading across social media platforms like DOIN, Weibo, and X, and even making its way to the Philippines. Within hours, local creators and news outlets jumped on the bandwagon, providing analysis and commentary on the scandal.
At first, the person in the video was dubbed “Red Uncle” by netizens, based on his distinctive red attire and the strange presence he exuded in the footage. However, this was only the beginning of a much larger and more disturbing story that would come to light. It was later revealed that the true source of the video and the scandal came from a private and deeply personal incident that would trigger a full-scale criminal investigation.
Before the video had gone viral, one man had discovered something he never expected to see. He came across a private video featuring himself in an intimate encounter with a man who was later identified as “Red Uncle.” The video had been recorded without his knowledge or consent. Shocked and humiliated, he immediately reported the incident to the police, setting off the investigation that would eventually expose the man behind the deceit.
The investigation led authorities to uncover the true identity of the person behind the secret recordings—Shujie, a man who had been operating under various online personas, including one as a fake female character named “Sister Hong.” In this persona, Shujie lured unsuspecting men into intimate encounters, promising discrete fun without any financial exchange, but instead asking for small gifts such as cooking oil, fruit, or kitchen appliances. The gifts made these interactions seem like innocent exchanges, masking the true, manipulative nature of his actions.
Shujie’s actions went beyond just making videos for personal pleasure. He had been secretly recording these encounters in various locations, including his home, motels, and secluded spots. Authorities later revealed that more than 35 men had been filmed without their consent, many of whom had no idea that they were being recorded. While homosexuality is not illegal in China, the act of secretly filming intimate encounters and distributing such footage without consent is a clear violation of privacy laws. As the investigation deepened, Shujie was removed from social media platforms, and his devices were seized for further examination.
What authorities found on Shujie’s devices was truly shocking. Digital forensic investigators uncovered thousands of videos, photos, and chat logs documenting Shujie’s sexual encounters with men over the past three years. The number of men involved was staggering—1,691 documented encounters between 2022 and 2025, with many more likely unrecorded. These encounters were meticulously archived with dates, locations, and other details, and were not intended for personal use, but for exploitation. Shujie had set up a private online group where members paid to access his video library, which was being distributed on adult platforms after some of the videos were leaked.
The victims of Shujie’s deceit were ordinary men—students, gym staff, office workers, and even foreign expats—most of whom were unaware that they were being secretly filmed. Some were straight men who had been manipulated into believing they were engaging with a female persona. However, the true horror of the situation came to light when rumors started circulating that Shujie was HIV positive, a detail he allegedly knew for some time. This revelation only deepened the already concerning nature of his actions, as it was suspected that he intentionally targeted straight men, exposing them to the virus.
Shujie’s motives, it seemed, were far darker than mere sexual pleasure. The theory emerged that his actions were part of a calculated and twisted plan for revenge. After discovering his HIV status, Shujie allegedly harbored deep resentment and used his encounters with unsuspecting men as a form of punishment, exposing them to a disease that could alter their lives forever. It appeared that Shujie had intentionally selected his targets—straight, curious men, many of whom were unaware of the dangerous risks they were taking. These men had unknowingly been put at risk, not only for themselves but for their families, partners, and communities as well.
As the investigation continued, it became evident that the scope of the damage was far greater than originally thought. Authorities now faced the challenge of determining how many more men had been affected, especially since only 1,691 encounters had been documented. The true number could be much higher, with some encounters never recorded or archived.
On July 6, 2025, Shujie was arrested, and his social media access was revoked. Authorities began to piece together the full extent of his criminal activities, and he now faces multiple charges, including invasion of privacy, illegal distribution of obscene material, and non-consensual video recording. But the damage had already been done. His personal information was spread across social media platforms, and public outrage was swift. People were calling for justice, while others reminded the public that due process must be followed.
The scandal sent ripples through the online community, causing widespread panic among men who may have unknowingly been involved in Shujie’s scheme. The fear was palpable, as many wondered whether they too had been unknowingly recorded and exposed to the same dangers. The case of Shujie, or Red Uncle, highlighted the disturbing reality of digital exploitation and the vulnerability of individuals in the age of online personas.
As the investigation progressed, authorities warned the public about the dangers of online interactions and the importance of safeguarding digital privacy. With the rise of digital exploitation, it has become clear that no one is truly safe from these hidden threats. The case of Red Uncle is a stark reminder of the risks that lurk in the shadows of the internet, and it calls for stronger regulations and protections to prevent such exploitation from happening again.
The horrifying story of Red Uncle serves as a chilling wake-up call to the dangers of the digital age. It is a warning that the lines between trust and manipulation are becoming increasingly blurred, and that behind every online persona may lie a dangerous predator waiting to strike. The public’s trust in digital platforms has been shattered, and the fear that others like Shujie may still be operating in the shadows looms large. What will be the next step in addressing this crisis? And how many more victims are out there, still unaware of the dangers they face? The world watches, waiting for answers.